2018年考研英语一真题及答案解析

余年寄山水
832次浏览
2021年02月21日 04:31
最佳经验
本文由作者推荐

-

2021年2月21日发(作者:2016年央视春晚)



2018


解析



年考研英语一真题及答案



2018< /p>


年考研英语一真题原文及答案解析完整版




2018


年全国硕士研究生入学统一 考试英语


(



)




Section I Use of English




Directions:




Read


the


following


text.


Choose


the


best


word


(s)


for


each


numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10


points)




Trust


is


a


tricky


business.


On


the


one


hand,


it's


a


necessary


condition 1 many worthwhile things: child care, friendships, etc. On


the other hand, putting your 2, in the wrong place often carries a


high 3.




4, why do we trust at all? Well, because it feels good. 5 people


place


their


trust


in


an


individual


or


an


institution,


their


brains


release


oxytocin,


a


hormone


that


6


pleasurable


feelings


and


triggers


the


herding


instruct


that


prompts


humans


to


7


with


one


another. Scientists have found that exposure 8 this hormone puts


us in a trusting 9: In a Swiss study, researchers sprayed oxytocin


into


the


noses


of


half


the


subjects;


those


subjects


were


ready


to


lend significantly higher amounts of money to strangers than were


their 10 who inhaled something else.




11 for us, we also have a sixth sense for dishonesty that may 12


us. A Canadian study found that children as young as 14 months can


differentiate


13


a


credible


person


and


a


dishonest


one.


Sixty


toddlers were each 14 to an adult tester holding a plastic container.


The


test


er


would


ask,


“What’s


in


here?”


before


looking


into


the


container, smiling, and exclaiming, “Wow!” Each subject was then



invited to look 15. Half of them found a toy; the other half 16 the


container was empty-and realized the tester had 17 them.




Among the children who had not been tricked, the majority were


18


to


cooperate


with


the


tester


in


learning


a


new


skill,


demonstrating that they trusted his leadership. 19, only five of the


30 children paired with the “20”tester participated in a follow


-up


activity.




1. [A] on [B] like [C] for [D] from




2. [A] faith [B] concern [C] attention [D] interest




3. [A] benefit [B] debt [C] hope [D] price




4. [A] Therefore [B] Then [C] Instead [D] Again




5. [A]Until [B] Unless [C] Although [D] When




6. [A] selects [B] produces [C] applies [D] maintains




7. [A] consult [B] compete [C] connect [D] compare




8. [A] at [B] by [C]of [D]to




9. [A] context [B] mood [C] period [D] circle




10.[A]


counterparts


[B]


substitutes


[C]


colleagues


[D]supporters




11.[A] Funny [B] Lucky [C] Odd [D] Ironic




12.[A] monitor [B] protect [C] surprise [D] delight




13.[A] between [B] within [C] toward [D] over




14.[A] transferred [B] added [C] introduced [D] entrusted




15.[A] out [B] back [C] around [D] inside




16.[A] discovered [B] proved [C] insisted [D] .remembered




17.[A] betrayed [B]wronged [C] fooled [D] mocked





18.[A] forced [B] willing [C] hesitant [D] entitled




19.[A]


In


contrast


[B]


As


a


result


[C]


On


the


whole


[D]


For


instance




20.[A] inflexible [B] incapable [C] unreliable [D] unsuitable






Section II Reading Comprehension




Part A




Directions:




Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each


text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER


SHEET. (40 points)




Text 1




Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one


that


will


probably


go


unmentioned


in


the


next


presidential


campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?




Don't dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are


at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford


study,


with


the


middle


class


disproportionately


squeezed.


Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don't appeal to robots.


But


many


middle-class


occupations-trucking,


financial


advice,


software engineering



have aroused their interest, or soon will.


The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.




This isn't to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological


upheaval


has


benefited


workers


in


the


past.


The


Industrial



Revolution didn't go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced


by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and


created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should


eventually


boost


productivity,


stimulate


demand


by


driving


down


prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium


term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.




The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in


The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job


training.


Curriculums



from


grammar


school


to


college-


should


evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and


complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job


of


fostering


problem-solving


skills


and


helping


students


work


alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional


kind.


It


could


make


extra


training


and


instruction


affordable.


Professionals


trying


to


acquire


new


skills


will


be


able


to


do


so


without going into debt.




The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for


the


U.S.


to


revive


its


fading


business


dynamism:


Starting


new


companies


must


be


made


easier.


In


previous


eras


of


drastic


technological


change,


entrepreneurs


smoothed


the


transition


by


dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of


3D printers and virtual reality haven't been invented yet. The U.S.


needs the new companies that will invent them.




Finally,


because


automation


threatens


to


widen


the


gap


between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net


will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut,


and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be


expanded:


This


would


boost


incomes,


encourage


work,


reward


companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.





Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the


next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their


lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines


that


are


coming


for


our


jobs


would


be


nuts.


But


policies


to


help


workers adapt will be indispensable.




will be most threatened by automation?




[A] Leading politicians.




[B]Low-wage laborers.




[C]Robot owners.




[D]Middle-class workers.




22 .Which of the following best represent the author’s view?





[A] Worries about automation are in fact groundless.




[B]Optimists' opinions on new tech find little support.




[C]Issues arising from automation need to be tackled




[D]Negative consequences of new tech can be avoided




ion


in


the


age


of


automation


should


put


more


emphasis on




[A] creative potential.




[B]job-hunting skills.




[C]individual needs.




[D]cooperative spirit.




author suggests that tax policies be aimed at




[A] encouraging the development of automation.




[B]increasing the return on capital investment.




[C]easing the hostility between rich and poor.





[D]preventing the income gap from widening.




this text, the author presents a problem with




[A] opposing views on it.




[B]possible solutions to it.




[C]its alarming impacts.




[D]its major variations.






Text 2




A new survey by Harvard University finds more than two-thirds


of young Americans disapprove of President Trump’s use of Twitter.


The


implication


is


that


Millennials


prefer


news


from


the


White


House to be filtered through other source, Not a pres


ident’s social


media platform.




Most Americans rely on social media to check daily headlines.


Yet as distrust has risen toward all media, people may be starting to


beef


up


their


media


literacy


skills.


Such


a


trend


is


badly


needed.


During


the


2016


presidential


campaign,


nearly


a


quarter


of


web


content


shared


by


Twitter


users


in


the


politically


critical


state


of


Michigan was fake news, according to the University of Oxford. And


a


survey


conducted


for


BuzzFeed


News


found


44


percent


of


Facebook users rarely or never trust news from the media giant.




Young people who are digital natives are indeed becoming more


skillful


at


separating


fact


from


fiction


in


cyberspace.


A


Knight


Foundation


focus-group


survey


of


young


people


between


ages


14and24 found they use “distributed trust” to verify stories. They


cross- check


sources


and


prefer


news


from


different


perspectives


—especially those that are open about any bias. “Many



young


people


assume


a


great


deal


of


personal


responsibility


for


educating


themselves


and


actively


seeking


out


opposing


viewpoints,” the survey concluded.





Such


active


research


can


have


another


effect.


A


2014


survey


conducted


in


Australia,


Britain,


and


the


United


States


by


the


University of Wisconsin-


Madison found that young people’s reliance


on social media led to greater political engagement.




Social


media


allows


users


to


experience


news


events


more


intimately and immediately while also permitting them to re-share


news as a projection of their values and interests. This forces users


to be more conscious of their role in passing along information. A


survey


by


Barna


research


group


found


the


top


reason


given


by


Americans for the fake news phenomenon is “reader error,” more


so than made-up stories or factual mistakes in reporting. About a


third


say


the


prob


lem


of


fake


news


lies


in


“misinterpretation


or


exaggeration of actual news” via social media. In other words, the


choice to share news on social media may be the heart of the issue.


“This


indicates


there


is


a


real


personal


responsibility


in


counteracting t


his problem,” says Roxanne Stone, editor in chief at


Barna Group.




So when young people are critical of an over-tweeting president,


they


reveal


a


mental


discipline


in


thinking


skills




and


in


their


choices on when to share on social media.




26.


According


to


the


Paragraphs


1


and


2,


many


young


Americans cast doubts on




[A] the justification of the news-filtering practice.




[B] people’s preference for social media platforms.





[C] the administrations ability to handle information.




[D] social media was a reliable source of news.





27. The phrase “beer up”(Line 2, Para. 2) is closest in meaning


to




[A] sharpen




[B] define




[C] boast




[D] share




28. According to the knight foundation survey, young people




[A] tend to voice their opinions in cyberspace.




[B] verify news by referring to diverse resources.




[C] have s strong sense of responsibility.




[D] like to exchange views on “distributed trust”





29. The Barna survey found that a main cause for the fake news


problem is




[A] readers outdated values.




[B] journalists’ biased reporting





[C] readers’ misinterpretation





[D] journalists’ made


-up stories.




30. Which of the following would be the best title for the text?




[A] A Rise in Critical Skills for Sharing News Online




[B] A Counteraction Against the Over-tweeting Trend




[C] The Accumulation of Mutual Trust on Social Media.




[D] The Platforms for Projection of Personal Interests.







Text 3




Any fair-minded assessment of the dangers of the deal between


Britain's National Health Service (NHS) and DeepMind must start by


acknowledging that both sides mean well. DeepMind is one of the


leading


artificial


intelligence


(AI)


companies


in


the


world.


The


potential


of


this


work


applied


to


healthcare


is


very


great,


but


it


could also lead to further concentration of power in the tech giants.


It Is against that background that the information commissioner,


Elizabeth


Denham,


has


issued


her


damning


verdict


against


the


Royal


Free


hospital


trust


under


the


NHS,


which


handed


over


to


DeepMind the records of 1.6 million patients In 2015 on the basis of


a vague agreement which took far too little account of the patients'


rights and their expectations of privacy.




DeepMind has almost apologized. The NHS trust has mended its


ways. Further arrangements- and there may be many-between the


NHS and DeepMind will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that all


necessary


permissions


have


been


asked


of


patients


and


all


unnecessary


data


has


been


cleaned.


There


are


lessons


about


informed patient consent to learn. But privacy is not the only angle


in this case and not even the most important. Ms Denham chose to


concentrate the blame on the NHS trust, since under existing law it


“controlled” the data and DeepMind merely “processed


distinction misses the point that it is processing and aggregation,


not the mere possession of bits, that gives the data value.




The great question is who should benefit from the analysis of all


the


data


that


our


lives


now


generate.


Privacy


law


builds


on


the


concept


of


damage


to


an


individual


from


identifiable


knowledge


about them. That misses the way the surveillance economy works.


The


data


of


an


individual


there


gains


its


value


only


when


it


is


compared with the data of countless millions more.





The use of privacy law to curb the tech giants in this instance


feels slightly maladapted. This practice does not address the real


worry.


It


is


not


enough


to


say


that


the


algorithms


DeepMind


develops will benefit patients and save lives. What matters is that


they will belong to a private monopoly which developed them using


public


resources.


If


software


promises


to


save


lives


on


the


scale


that dugs now can, big data may be expected to behave as a big


pharm has done. We are still at the beginning of this revolution and


small choices now may turn out to have gigantic consequences later.


A long struggle will be needed to avoid a future of digital feudalism.


Ms Denham's report is a welcome start.





is


true


of


the


agreement


between


the


NHS


and


DeepMind ?




[A] It caused conflicts among tech giants.




[B]


It failed to pay due attention to patient’s rights.





[C] It fell short of the latter's expectations




[D] It put both sides into a dangerous situation.




32. The NHS trust responded to Denham's verdict with




[A] empty promises.




[B] tough resistance.




[C] necessary adjustments.




[D] sincere apologies.




author argues in Paragraph 2 that




[A] privacy protection must be secured at all costs.




[B] leaking patients' data is worse than selling it.




[C] making profits from patients' data is illegal.





[D] the value of data comes from the processing of it




ing to the last paragraph, the real worry arising from


this deal is




[A] the vicious rivalry among big pharmas.




[B] the ineffective enforcement of privacy law.




[C] the uncontrolled use of new software.




[D] the monopoly of big data by tech giants.





author's


attitude


toward


the


application


of


AI


to


healthcare is




[A] ambiguous.




[B] cautious.




[C] appreciative.




[D] contemptuous.






Text 4




The


U.S.


Postal


Service


(USPS)


continues


to


bleed


red


ink.


It


reported a net loss of $$5.6 billion for fiscal 2016, the 10th straight


year its expenses have exceeded revenue. Meanwhile, it has more


than $$120 billion in unfunded liabilities, mostly for employee health


and retirement costs. There are many bankruptcies. Fundamentally,


the USPS is in a historic squeeze between technological change that


has


permanently


decreased


demand


for


its


bread-and-butter


product,


first-class


mail,


and


a


regulatory


structure


that


denies


management


the


flexibility


to


adjust


its


operations


to


the


new


reality





And interest groups ranging from postal unions to greeting-card


makers


exert


self-


interested


pressure


on


the


USPS’s


ultimate


overseer-Congress-insisting


that


whatever


else


happens


to


the


Postal


Service,


aspects


of


the


status


quo


they


depend


on


get


protected. This is why repeated attempts at reform legislation have


failed in recent years, leaving the Postal Service unable to pay its


bills except by deferring vital modernization.




Now


comes


word


that


everyone


involved---Democrats,


Republicans,


the


Postal


Service,


the


unions


and


the


system's


heaviest


users



has


finally


agreed


on


a


plan


to


fix


the


system.


Legislation is moving through the House that would save USPS an


estimated


$$28.6


billion


over


five


years,


which


could


help


pay


for


new vehicles, among other survival measures. Most of the money


would come from a penny-per- letter permanent rate increase and


from


shifting


postal


retirees


into


Medicare.


The


latter


step


would


largely offset the financial burden


of annually pre-funding retiree


health care, thus addressing a long- standing complaint by the USPS


and its union.




If


it


clears


the


House,


this


measure


would


still


have


to


get


through the Senate



where someone is bound to point out that it


amounts to the bare, bare minimum necessary to keep the Postal


Service


afloat,


not


comprehensive


reform.


There’s


no


change


to


collective


bargaining


at


the


USPS,


a


major


omission


considering


that personnel accounts for 80 percent of the agency’s costs. Also


missing


is


any


discussion


of


eliminating


Saturday


letter


delivery.


That common-sense change enjoys wide public support and would


save the USPS $$2 billion per year. But postal special-interest groups


seem


to


have


killed


it,


at


least


in


the


House.


The


emerging


consensus


around


the


bill


is


a


sign


that


legislators


are


getting


frightened about a politically embarrassing short-term collapse at



the


USPS.


It


is


not,


however,


a


sign


that


they’re


getting


serious


about transforming the postal system for the 21st century.




financial problem with the USPS is caused partly by




[A]. its unbalanced budget.




[B] .its rigid management.




[C] .the cost for technical upgrading.




[D]. the withdrawal of bank support.




37. According to Paragraph 2, the USPS fails to modernize itself


due to




[A]. the interference from interest groups.




[B] .the inadequate funding from Congress.




[C] .the shrinking demand for postal service.




[D] .the incompetence of postal unions.




long-standing complaint by the USPS and its unions can


be addressed by




[A] .removing its burden of retiree health care.




[B] .making more investment in new vehicles.




[C] .adopting a new rate-increase mechanism.




[D]. attracting more first-class mail users.




the last paragraph, the author seems to view legislators


with




[A] respect.




[B] tolerance.




[C] discontent.




[D] gratitude.





of the following would be the best title for the text?




[A] .The USPS Starts to Miss Its Good Old Days




[B] .The Postal Service: Keep Away from My Cheese




[C] .The USPS: Chronic Illness Requires a Quick Cure




[D] .The Postal Service Needs More than a Band-Aid






Part B




Directions:




The


following


paragraphs


are


given


in


a


wrong


order.


For


Questions 41-45, you are required to reorganize these paragraphs


into a coherent article by choosing from the list A-G and filling them


into the numbered boxes. Paragraphs C and F have been correctly


placed. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)




A. In December of 1869, Congress appointed a commission to


select a site and prepare plans and cost estimates for a new State


Department Building. The commission was also to consider possible


arrangements for the War and Navy Departments. To the horror of


some who expected a Greek Revival twin of the Treasury Building to


be


erected


on


the


other


side


of


the


White


House,


the


elaborate


French Second Empire style design by Alfred Mullett was selected,


and construction of a building to house all three departments began


in June of 1871.




B. Completed in 1875, the State Department's south wing was


the


first


to


be


occupied,


with


its


elegant


four- story


library


(completed in 1876), Diplomatic Reception Room, and Secretary's


office decorated with carved wood, Oriental rugs, and stenciled wall


patterns. The Navy Department moved into the east wing in 1879,



where


elaborate


wall


and


ceiling


stenciling


and


marquetry


floors


decorated the office of the Secretary.




C. The State, War, and Navy Building, as it was originally known,


housed


the


three


Executive


Branch


Departments


most


intimately


associated


with


formulating


and


conducting


the


nation's


foreign


policy


in


the


last


quarter


of


the


nineteenth


century


and


the


first


quarter of the twentieth century-the period when the United States


emerged as an international power. The building has housed some


of the nation's most significant diplomats and politicians and has


been the scene of many historic events.




D.


Many


of


the


most


celebrated


national


figures


have


participated


in


historical


events


that


have


taken


place


within


the


EEOB's granite walls. Theodore and Franklin D. Roosevelt, William


Howard


Taft,


Dwight


D.


Eisenhower,


Lyndon


B.


Johnson,


Gerald


Ford, and George H. W. Bush all had offices in this building before


becoming president. It has housed 16 Secretaries of the Navy, 21


Secretaries of War, and 24 Secretaries of State. Winston Churchill


once walked its corridors and Japanese emissaries met here with


Secretary of State Cordell Hull after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.




E. The Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) commands


a unique position in both the national history and the architectural


heritage of the United States. Designed by Supervising Architect of


the Treasury, Alfred B. Mullett, it was built from 1871 to 1888 to


house the growing staffs of the State, War, and Navy Departments,


and


is


considered


one


of


the


best


examples


of


French


Second


Empire architecture in the country.




F. Construction took 17 years as the building slowly rose wing


by


wing.


When


the


EEOB


was


finished,


it


was


the


largest


office


building in Washington, with nearly 2 miles of black and white tiled


corridors. Almost all of the interior detail is of cast iron or plaster;



the


use


of


wood


was


minimized


to


insure


fire


safety.


Eight


monumental


curving


staircases


of


granite


with


over


4,000


individually


cast


bronze


balusters


are


capped


by


four


skylight


domes and two stained glass rotundas.




G.


The


history


of


the


EEOB


began


long


before


its


foundations


were


laid.


The


first


executive


offices


were


constructed


between


1799 and 1820. A series of fires (including those set by the British in


1814)


and


overcrowded


conditions


led


to


the


construction


of


the


existing Treasury Building. In 1866, the construction of the North


Wing


of


the


Treasury


Building


necessitated


the


demolition


of


the


State Department building.




41. à





42. à





43. à


F à




44 à


45.






Part C




Directions:




Read


the


following


text


carefully


and


then


translate


the


underlined


segments


into


Chinese.


Your


translation


should


be


written neatly on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)




Shakespeare’s


life


time


was


coincide


nt


with


a


period


of


extraordinary activity and achievement in the drama. By the date of


his birth Europe was witnessing the passing of the religious drama,


and


the


creation


of


new


forms


under


the


incentive


of


classical


tragedy and comedy. These new forms were at first mainly written


by


scholars


and


performed


by


amateurs,


but


in


England,


as


everywhere


else


in


western


Europe,


the


growth


of


a


class


of


professional


actors


was


threatening


to


make


the


drama


popular,


whether it should be new or old, classical or medieval, literary or


farcical. Court, school organizations of amateurs, and the traveling



actors were all rivals in supplying a widespread desire for dramatic


entertainment; and (47) no boy who went a grammar school could


be


ignorant


that


the


drama


was


a


form


of


literature


which


gave


glory to Greece and Rome and might yet bring honor to England.




When


Shakespeare


was


twelve


years


old,


the


first


public


playhouse


was


built


in


London.


For


a


time


literature


showed


no


interest


in


this


public


stage.


Plays


aiming


at


literary


distinction


were written for school or court, or for the choir boys of St. Paul’s


and the royal chapel, who, however, gave plays in public as well as


at


court.(48)but


the


professional


companies


prospered


in


their


permanent theaters, and university men with literature ambitions


were


quick


to


turn


to


these


theaters


as


offering


a


means


of


livelihood. By the time Shakespeare was twenty-five, Lyly, Peele,


and


Greene


had


made


comedies


that


were


at


once


popular


and


literary;


Kyd


had


written


a


tragedy


that


crowded


the


pit;


and


Marlowe had brought poetry and genius to triumph on the common


stage - where they had played no part since the death of Euripides.


(49)A native literary drama had been created, its alliance with the


public


playhouses


established,


and


at


least


some


of


its


great


traditions had been begun.




The


development


of


the


Elizabethan


drama


for


the


next


twenty-five years is of exceptional interest to students of literary


history, for in this brief period we may trace the beginning, growth,


blossoming, and decay of many kinds of plays, and of many great


careers.


We


are


amazed


today


at


the


mere


number


of


plays


produced,


as


well


as


by


the


number


of


dramatists


writing


at


the


same


time


for


this


London


of


two


hundred


thousand


inhabitants.


(50)To


realize


how


great


was


the


dramatic


activity,


we


must


remember


further


that


hosts


of


plays


have


been


lost,


and


that


probably there is no author of note whose entire work has survived.

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-